Rhetoric and the rule of law: a theory of legal reasoning

New York: Oxford University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book discusses theories of legal reasoning and provides an overall view of the rhetoric of legal justification. It shows how and why lawyers arguments can be rationally persuasive even though rarely, if ever, logically conclusive or compelling. It examines the role of "legal syllogism" and universality of legal reasoning, looking at arguments of consequentialism and principle, and concludes by questioning the infallibility of judges as lawmakers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
The authority of law: essays on law and morality.Joseph Raz - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Mastering legal analysis and communication.David T. Ritchie - 2008 - Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Law as rule and principle: problems of legal philosophy.Theodore M. Benditt - 1978 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Legality.Scott Shapiro (ed.) - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Moral theory and legal reasoning.Scott Brewer (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Garland.
MacCormick's Jurisprudence Determined.James Lee - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (1):105-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#402,620)

6 months
12 (#121,357)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?