On the cardinal utility equivalence of biseparable preferences

Theory and Decision 92 (3-4):689-701 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We establish a simple condition, based on the willingness to bet on events, under which two biseparable preferences have cardinally equivalent utilities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Eliciting beliefs.Robert Chambers & Tigran Melkonyan - 2008 - Theory and Decision 65 (4):271-284.
Failures of SCH and Level by Level Equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (7):831-838.
An Easton theorem for level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (3):247-253.
Diamond, square, and level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (3):387-395.
Inaccessible Cardinals, Failures of GCH, and Level-by-Level Equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):431-444.
Tallness and level by level equivalence and inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (1):4-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
6 (#1,269,502)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity.Peter P. Wakker - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references