Narratives of mastery and resistance: Lay ethics of nanotechnology [Book Review]
NanoEthics 4 (2):141-151 (2010)
Abstract
This paper contributes towards a lay ethics of nanotechnology through an analysis of talk from focus groups designed to examine how laypeople grapple with the meaning of a technology ‘in-the-making’. We describe the content of lay ethical concerns before suggesting that this content can be understood as being structured by five archetypal narratives which underpin talk. These we term: ‘the rich get richer and the poor get poorer’; ‘kept in the dark’; ‘opening Pandora’s box’; ‘messing with nature’; and ‘be careful what you wish for’. We further suggest that these narratives can be understood as sharing an emphasis on the ‘giftedness’ of life, and that together they are used to resist dominant technoscientific and Enlightenment narratives of control and mastery which are encapsulated by nanotechnologyDOI
10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5
My notes
Similar books and articles
Engaging Narratives and the Limits of Lay Ethics: Introduction. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann & Phil Macnaghten - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):133-140.
Nanotechnology — a new field of ethical inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.
The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics. [REVIEW]George D. Randels - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1299 - 1310.
The social impacts of nanotechnology: An ethical and political analysis. [REVIEW]Robert Sparrow - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):13-23.
The Structure and Objectivity of Historical Narratives.C. Behan Mccullagh - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:145-158.
The rhetoric of nanotechnology.David M. Berube - 2004 - In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios. pp. 173--192.
How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology.Ibo van de Poel - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):25-38.
Ethics and technology 'in the making': An essay on the challenge of nanoethics. [REVIEW]Deborah G. Johnson - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):21-30.
What’s Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology?: Foundational Questions and Answers. [REVIEW]Robert E. McGinn - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):115-128.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-11-17
Downloads
38 (#309,085)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2010-11-17
Downloads
38 (#309,085)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Beyond conversation: Some lessons for nanoethics. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):171-181.
Citizen Science Fiction: The Potential of Situated Speculative Prototyping for Public Engagement on Emerging Technologies.Jantien W. Schuijer, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse & Frank Kupper - 2021 - NanoEthics 15 (1):1-18.
A Lay Ethics Quest for Technological Futures: About Tradition, Narrative and Decision-Making.Simone van der Burg - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):233-244.
Assembling Upstream Engagement: the Case of the Portuguese Deliberative Forum on Nanotechnologies.António Carvalho & João Arriscado Nunes - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):99-113.
References found in this work
The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.J. F. Lyotard - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:520.
Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology.Alan Irwin & Brian Wynne (eds.) - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering.Michael J. Sandel - 2012 - In Stephen Holland (ed.), Arguing About Bioethics. Routledge. pp. 93.
Developments in the debate on nanoethics: Traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. [REVIEW]Arianna Ferrari - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):27-52.