Miller's so-called paradox of information

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):144-147 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paradox of Inference and the Non-Triviality of Analytic Information.Marie Duží - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):473 - 510.
Miller's so-called paradox of information.Colin Howson & Graham Oddie - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):253-261.
A paradox of information.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):59-61.
A comment on Miller's new paradox of information.Karl R. Popper - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):61-69.
Miller's paradox of information.Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):63-67.
Some considerations on conditional chances.Paul Humphreys - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):667-680.
The paradoxes of analysis and synonymy.S. D. Rieber - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):103 - 116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#194,716)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Have your cake and eat it too: The old principal principle reconciled with the new.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368–382.
The straight and narrow rule of induction: A reply to dr Bub and mr Radner.David Miller - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):145-152.
New mysteries for old: The transfiguration of Miller's paradox.William W. Rozeboom - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (4):345-353.
A suggested resolution of Miller's paradox.I. J. Good - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):288-289.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references