Mr. Donnellan and humpty dumpty on referring

Philosophical Review 77 (2):197-202 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is humpty dumpty vindicated?Gershon Weiler - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):278 – 281.
James Joyce and Humpty Dumpty.Donald Davidson - 1989 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):1-12.
Humpty dumpty and verbal meaning.Michael Hancher - 1981 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1):49-58.
Sham reasoning, Humpty Dumpty, and the burden of proof.Fiona J. Hibberd - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):91-96.
Putting humpty dumpty together again.Keith S. Donnellan - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (2):203-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
141 (#128,328)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Scientific representation.Roman Frigg & James Nguyen - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Defence of Intentionalism about Demonstratives.Alex Radulescu - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 775-791.
A Deranged Argument Against Public Languages.Robert J. Stainton - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (1):6-32.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references