Mr. Donnellan and humpty dumpty on referring
Philosophical Review 77 (2):197-202 (1968)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.2307/2183320
My notes
Similar books and articles
Dealing with Humpty Dumpty: Research, Practice, and the Ethics of Public Health Surveillance.Amy L. Fairchild - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):615-623.
Is humpty dumpty vindicated?Gershon Weiler - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):278 – 281.
Humpty Dumpty and the “Sneaky O” Proposition.Theodore E. James - 1971 - New Scholasticism 45 (4):590-599.
Humpty dumpty and verbal meaning.Michael Hancher - 1981 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1):49-58.
Sham reasoning, Humpty Dumpty, and the burden of proof.Fiona J. Hibberd - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):91-96.
Putting humpty dumpty together again.Keith S. Donnellan - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (2):203-215.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
123 (#103,121)
6 months
7 (#116,605)
2009-01-28
Downloads
123 (#103,121)
6 months
7 (#116,605)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Speaker's reference, semantic reference, sneaky reference.Eliot Michaelson - 2022 - Mind and Language 37 (5):856-875.
A Defence of Intentionalism about Demonstratives.Alex Radulescu - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 775-791.
Meta-Metasemantics, or the Quest for the One True Metasemantics.Ethan Nowak & Eliot Michaelson - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):135-154.
