Langages 1 (13) (2022)

Fabrizio Macagno
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
The fallacy of ignoring qualifications, or secundum quid et simpliciter, is a deceptive strategy that is pervasive in argumentative dialogues, discourses, and discussions. It consists in misrepresenting an utterance so that its meaning is broadened, narrowed, or simply modified to pursue different goals, such as drawing a specific conclusion, attacking the interlocutor, or generating humorous reactions. The “secundum quid” was described by Aristotle as an interpretative manipulative strategy, based on the contrast between the “proper” sense of a statement and its meaning taken absolutely or in a certain respect. However, how can an “unqualified” statement have a proper meaning different from the qualified one, and vice versa? This “linguistic” fallacy brings to light a complex relationship between pragmatics, argumentation, and interpretation. The secundum quid is described in this paper as a manipulative argument, whose deceptive effect lies in its pragmatic dimension. This fallacy is analyzed as a strategy of decontextualization lying at the interface between pragmatics and argumentation and consisting of the unwarranted passage from an ut-terance to its semantic representation. By ignoring the available evidence and the presumptive interpretation of a statement, the speaker places it in a different context or suppresses textual and contextual evidence to infer a specific meaning different from the presumable one.
Keywords explicature  pragmatics  fallacies~  secundum quid  straw man  manipulation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - London, England: Vale Press.

View all 57 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid.David Botting - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):161-170.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
Non-Propositional Meanings and Commitment Attribution.Misha-Laura Müller - 2020 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (1):148-166.
Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #322,935 of 2,498,848 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #24,920 of 2,498,848 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes