How things might have been: individuals, kinds, and essential properties

New York: Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A novel treatment of an issue central to much current work in metaphysics: the distinction between the essential and accidental properties of individuals. Mackie challenges widely held views, and arrives at what she calls "minimalist essentialism," an unorthodox theory according to which ordinary individuals have relatively few interesting essential properties. Mackie's clear and accessible discussions of issues surrounding necessity and essentialism mean that the book will appeal as much to graduate students as it will to seasoned metaphysicians.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
220 (#88,149)

6 months
22 (#118,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Penelope Mackie
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

Modal science.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):453-492.
Identity.Harold Noonan & Benjamin L. Curtis - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Modality is Not Explainable by Essence.Carlos Romero - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):121-141.
Identity and Indiscernibility.K. Hawley - 2009 - Mind 118 (469):101-119.

View all 91 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references