Here Be Monsters: Imperialism, Knowledge and the Limits of Empire

Text Matters - a Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture 6 (1):74-95 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has become a truism in discussions of Imperialist literature to state that the British empire was, in a very significant way, a textual exercise. Empire was simultaneously created and perpetuated through a proliferation of texts driven significantly by a desire for what Thomas Richards describes as “one great system of knowledge.” The project of assembling this system assumed that all of the “alien” knowledges that it drew upon could be easily assimilated into existing, “universal” epistemological categories. This belief in “one great system” assumed that knowledges from far-flung outposts of empire could, through careful categorization and control, be made to reinforce, rather than threaten, the authority of imperial epistemic rule. But this movement into “new” epistemic as well as physical spaces opened up the disruptive possibility for and encounter with Foucault’s “insurrection of subjugated knowledges.” In the Imperial Gothic stories discussed here, the space between “knowing all there is to know” and the inherent unknowability of the “Other” is played out through representations of failures of classification and anxieties about the limits of knowledge. These anxieties are articulated through what is arguably one of the most heavily regulated signifiers of scientific progress at the turn of the century: the body. In an age that was preoccupied with bodies as spectacles that signified everything from criminal behaviour, psychological disorder, moral standing and racial categorization, the mutable, unclassifiable body functions as a signifier that mediates between imperial fantasies of control and definition and fin-de-siècle anxieties of dissolution and degeneration. In Imperial Gothic fiction these fears appear as a series of complex explorations of the ways in which the gap between the known and the unknown can be charted on and through a monstrous body that moves outside of stable classification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire.Jason König & Tim Whitmarsh (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A social history of knowledge.Peter Burke - 2012 - Malden, MA: Polity.
What’s Empire Got to Do with It? The Derivation of America’s Foreign Policy.Earl C. Ravenal - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (1):21-75.
A Turn to Empire.Jennifer Pitts - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (2).
Toward an Ethics of Knowledge.Vítor Westhelle - 2004 - Zygon 39 (2):383-388.
Albert Venn Dicey and the Constitutional Theory of Empire.Dylan Lino - 2016 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36 (4):751-780.
Republican imperialism: J.A. Froude and the virtue of empire.Duncan Bell - 2009 - History of Political Thought 30 (1):166-191.
The Empire of Disorder.Ames Hodges (ed.) - 2002 - Semiotext(E).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-21

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references