G and Darwinian algorithms

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):685-686 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stanovich & West's assumption of discrete System 1 and System 2 mechanisms is questionable. System 2 can be understood as emerging from individuals who score high on several normally distributed cognitive mechanisms supporting System 1. Cognitions ascribed to System 1 and System 2 appear to be directed toward the same evolutionary significant goals, and thus are likely to have emerged from the same selection pressures.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemically-Qualified Judgment.Wayne Backman - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:1-27.
Are there two different types of thinking?Stephen E. Newstead - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):690-691.
The Tao of thinking.Deborah Frisch - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):672-673.
Is cultural evolution Lamarckian?Maria E. Kronfeldner - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):493-512.
Rational distinctions and adaptations.D. E. Over & J. St B. T. Evans - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#284,290)

6 months
17 (#141,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Kevin MacDonald
Fashion Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references