Equivocation as a Point of Order

Argumentation 21 (3):223-231 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Equivocation, or multiple meaning, is explained through the introduction of an additional response, the distinction, to points of order in formal dialogue objecting to immediate inconsistency

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
37 (#407,825)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.
On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references