Diagrammatic reasoning in Frege’s Begriffsschrift

Synthese 186 (1):289-314 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Part III of his 1879 logic Frege proves a theorem in the theory of sequences on the basis of four definitions. He claims in Grundlagen that this proof, despite being strictly deductive, constitutes a real extension of our knowledge, that it is ampliative rather than merely explicative. Frege furthermore connects this idea of ampliative deductive proof to what he thinks of as a fruitful definition, one that draws new lines. My aim is to show that we can make good sense of these claims if we read Frege’s notation diagrammatically, in particular, if we take that notation to have been designed to enable one to exhibit the (inferentially articulated) contents of concepts in a way that allows one to reason deductively on the basis of those contents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Frege's Logical Diagrams.Iulian D. Toader - 2004 - In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Springer: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2980,. pp. 22-25.
What Frege’s Theory of Identity is Not.Robert May - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):41-48.
Frege on identities.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):195-205.
Frege on Indirect Proof.Ivan Welty - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):283-290.
Frege and the rigorization of analysis.William Demopoulos - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (3):225 - 245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-29

Downloads
201 (#95,321)

6 months
13 (#165,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Danielle Macbeth
Haverford College