A note on relativity before Einstein

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):232-234 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A [1983] review, 'Relativity before Einstein' made no mention of the work of Joseph Larmor, whose early derivation of the Lorentz transformation seems to be less well known than those of Lorentz and Poincare. In 1897, Larmor, starting from a first-order transformation similar to Lorentz's first order version, presented the correct form of what is now known as the Lorentz transformation. In his presentation of the theory in 1900 Larmor saw the time dilation effect as a consequence of Maxwell's electromagnetic theory. It was Lorentz who, in 1895, introduced the notion of the relativity of simultaneity (local time), without the time dilation effect. Poincare in 1900 discussed how Lorentz's local time would arise from the procedure of synchronizing moving clocks by exchanging light signals assumed to travel at the same speed in either direction. Lorentz presented the correct version of the transformation in 1899, and discussed the variation of mass with velocity arising from it. In 1902 Lorentz was aware of Larmor's 1897 work but apparently missed its significance. Nevertheless, the credit for the first presentation of the Lorentz transformation including the crucial time dilation belongs to Larmor

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
369 (#52,128)

6 months
37 (#95,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Intimations of relativity relativity before Einstein.G. H. Keswani & C. W. Kilmister - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):343-354.
Michelson.[author unknown] - 1931 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 38 (2):16-16.

Add more references