Aristotle's definition of anagnorisis

American Journal of Philology 121 (3):367-383 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue for a new construal of Aristotle’s definition of anagnorisis (recognition) in Poetics 11. Virtually all translators and interpreters of the definition have understood the phrase ton pros eutuchian e dustuchian horismenon as a subjective genitive characterizing the persons involved in the recognition. I argue that it should instead be taken as a partitive genitive characterizing the genus of changes (metabolon) of which recognitions are a species. In addition to being preferable on philogical grounds, the construal I recommend helps illuminate the relation between recognition and reversal (peripeteia) and makes sense of Aristotle’s views about the relative values of various kinds of recognition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
111 (#156,045)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John MacFarlane
University of California, Berkeley

References found in this work

Aristotle’s Physics.W. D. Ross - 1936 - Philosophy 11 (43):352-354.
Aristotle's Physics.W. D. Ross - 1936 - Mind 45 (179):378-383.
Aristotle Poetics.D. W. Lucas - 1968 - The Classical Review 18 (02):168-.

View all 16 references / Add more references