A challenge to the kripke/putnam distinction between epistemic and metaphysical necessity

Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2):113--128 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the account of the epistemic modalities developed by Kripke and Putnam is incomplete since it does not make use of the possible worlds machinery that is indispensable to their analysis of the metaphysical modalities. It would have been simpler and more elegant if they had used the concept of 'possible world' to explain both modalities. Instead, they provide an explication of the epistemic modalities in terms of the vague concepts of conceivability and revisability. I show that logical omniscience as a consequence of a possible worlds analysis of the epistemic modalities can be made palatable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-22

Downloads
41 (#368,129)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian MacPherson
University of Windsor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references