Argumentation and Interpretation in Law

Ratio Juris 6 (1):16-29 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9337.1993.tb00135.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.
Between authority and interpretation: on the theory of law and practical reason.Joseph Raz (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
Legal reasoning and legal theory.Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Analogy argumentation in law: A dialectical perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.
Abstract argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.
Legal interpretation: perspectives from other disciplines and private texts.Kent Greenawalt - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Legal interpretation: perspectives from other disciplines and private texts.Kent Greenawalt - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
American Legal argumentation: The Law and Literature/rhetoric movement. [REVIEW]Eileen A. Scallen - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):705-717.
Neil MacCormick's Second Thoughts on Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. A Defence of the Original View.Aldo Schiavello - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (2):140-155.
Law and interpretation: essays in legal philosophy.Andrei Marmor (ed.) - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is bad law still law? Is bad law really law?Julie Dickson - unknown
The challenge of originalism: theories of constitutional interpretation.Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
231 (#84,276)

6 months
18 (#135,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles.Hin-Yan Liu - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3):193-207.
Where Objective Facts and Norms Meet (and What this Means for Law).Stefano Bertea - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 36 (1):249-274.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Legal language and legal interpretation.Jerzy Wróblewski - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (2):239 - 255.

Add more references