Philosophia 38 (1) (2010)

Authors
Napoleon Mabaquiao
De La Salle University
Abstract
This paper primarily disputes Dreyfus’s account of Heidegger’s critique of Husserl’s theory of intentionality. Specifically, it raises objections to the three central claims of such an account; namely: that Searle’s theory of intentional action can be used as a stand-in for Husserl’s; that Heidegger rejects the primordiality of the intentionality of consciousness; and that Heidegger distinguishes between conscious and unconscious types of intentional actions and he privileges the latter over the former. I show the first to be unwarranted owing to a lack of fundamental parallelisms between Searle’s and Husserl’s theories of intentionality. I show the second to be mistaken for failing to take into account Heidegger’s strategic handling of the concept of consciousness and for contradicting Heidegger’s concept of care as the essential meaning of Dasein’s being-in-the-world. Lastly, I show the third to be highly problematic for lacking in textual evidence and explanatory power.
Keywords Hubert Dreyfus  Martin Heidegger  Edmund Husserl  John Searle  Intentionality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):172-179.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heidegger's Critique of Husserl's and Brentano's Accounts of Intentionality.Dermot Moran - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):39-65.
Heidegger's Critique of the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality.Hubert Dreyfus - 1993 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 60:17-38.
Husserlian Intentionality and Everyday Coping.Kristana Arp - 1996 - In Thomas Nenon & Lester Embree (eds.), Issues in Husserl's Ideas Ii. pp. 161--171.
Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl.Søren Overgaard - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Is Searle an Internalist?Kanya Sen Gupta - 2007 - Philosophical Writings 35 (2).
What Does Heidegger Mean by the Transcendence of Dasein?Dermot Moran - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (4):491-514.
Temporality and Boredom.Victor Biceaga - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2):135-153.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
323 ( #33,012 of 2,519,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,675 of 2,519,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes