- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Open texture and the Possibility of Legal Interpretation
Law and Philosophy 18 (3):297-309 (1999)
Abstract
No AbstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Legal reality: A naturalist approach to legal ontology. [REVIEW]Michael S. Moore - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (6):619 - 705.
Legal Reality: A Naturalist Approach to Legal Ontology.Michael S. Moore - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (6):619-705.
Legal positivism and the nature of legal obligation.T. Christiano & S. Sciaraffa - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (5):487-512.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Remarks on a legal positivist misuse of Wittgenstein's later philosophy.Stefano Bertea - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (6):513-535.
The Application of Kelsen's Theory of the Legal System to European Community Law – The Supremacy Puzzle Resolved.Ines Weyland - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (1):1-37.
The Problem of Law's Authority: John Finnis and Joseph Raz on Legal Obligation.S. Aiyar - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):465-489.
Raz on constitutional interpretation.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (2):167-193.
Of final things: Morality as one of the ultimate determinants of legal validity. [REVIEW]Matthew Kramer - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (1):47-97.
The Irrationality of Merciful Legal Judgement: Exclusionary Reasoning and the Question of the Particular.Emilios A. Christodoulidis - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (3):215-241.
Objectivity, interpretation, and rights: A critique of Dworkin. [REVIEW]Jon Mahoney - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (2):187-222.
Formalizing multiple interpretation of legal knowledge.Andreas Hamfelt - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):221-265.
Final authority to bind with moral mistakes: On the explanatory potential of inclusive legal positivism. [REVIEW]Kenneth E. Himma - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 24 (1):1-45.
Open Texture and Judicial Decision.Bruce L. Miller - 1972 - Social Theory and Practice 2 (2):163-175.
Open Texture and Judicial Law-Making.Thomas R. Kearns - 1972 - Social Theory and Practice 2 (2):177-187.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
93 (#180,495)
6 months
3 (#1,023,809)
2009-01-28
Downloads
93 (#180,495)
6 months
3 (#1,023,809)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Friedrich Waismann’s Open Texture Argument and Definability of Empirical Concepts.Vitaly Ogleznev - 2022 - Philosophia 51 (1):273-286.
La différence barthésienne entre «écrivains et écrivants» et la «The Open Texture of Law» décrite par H. L. A. Hart.Michael Weinberger - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (2):409-419.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo