Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (3):25-34 (2018)
AbstractRecent work on Imre Lakatos’s missing Hungarian dissertation on the historical sociology of science sheds new light on his mature philosophy of science. Remembered primarily as an “internalist” defender of the autonomy of science, and a Cold Warrior in politics, commentators have mistaken his contribution as primarily a rearguard action against the followers of Thomas Kuhn and the “externalists” influenced by Boris Hessen. It comes as a surprise, then, to find that he developed and retained a fully general sociology of scientific knowledge, with Marxist roots that articulated Lenin’s “inexhaustible atom.” He carried forward this emphasis on the fallible, changing, and incomplete nature of our engagement with the natural world by a dialectical account of how research programs advance and recede historically. In his effort to develop a synthesis of Popper and Kuhn, and via his engagement with Paul Feyerabend, he continued to develop a distinctly dialectical approach to science.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Between Kin Selection and Cultural Relativism: Cultural Evolution and the Origin of Inequality.William T. Lynch - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (2):278-315.
After the Gold Rush: Cleaning Up After Steve Fuller’s Theosis.William T. Lynch - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):505-523.
Proliferation Update. Testing the Science and Technology Studies Mainstream Through Current Science’s Controversies.Ilya Kasavin & Lada Shipovalova - 2022 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 52 (5):290-298.
Similar books and articles
The Challenge to Consensus.William T. Lynch - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (3):57-61.
On Some Conceptual Background of Imre Lakatos’ Thought.Svetlana V. Shibarshina - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (3):52-56.
Observation, Meaning and Theory: Review of For and Against Method by Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW]Nicholas Maxwell - 2000 - Times Higher Education Supplement 1:30-30.
Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, and Aim-Oriented Empiricism.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):181-239.
What Do the Marxist “Dialectics of Cognition” and Lakatos’s “Sophisticated Falsificationism” Have in Common?Vladimir N. Porus - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (3):35-40.
Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos.R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.) - 1976 - Reidel.
An Hungarian Tragedy.Jerome R. Ravetz - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):413 – 422.
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini - 1999 - University of Chicago Press.
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical Papers.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Imre Lakatos in China.F. Dainian - 1989 - In Kostas Gavroglu, Yorgos Goudaroulis & Pantelis Nicolacopoulos (eds.), Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. pp. 59-67.
Mathematics, Science and Epistemology: Volume 2, Philosophical Papers.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Nachruf Auf Imre Lakatos: Imre Lakatos : Philosopher of Mathematics and Philosopher of Science.[author unknown] - 1974 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 5 (2):211-217.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.