Shame, gender, birth

Hypatia 21 (1):101-118 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: In recent years, critics of modern obstetrics have cited technology as responsible for women's discontent regarding childbirth. In this essay, I investigate and pry apart the connection between the quality of childbirth experience and technology. After identifying three factors considered constitutive of a 'good birth,' I demonstrate how technology can either facilitate or hinder each, but how dominant strains of birthing practice that reinforce female shame (hospital-based obstetrics and midwifery) consistently undermine them all. It is not technology per se, but its sensitive application, which may most effectively promote an optimal and affirming birth experience

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#295,072)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology.Alison M. Jaggar - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 176.
Pregnant embodiment: Subjectivity and alienation.Iris Marion Young - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1):45-62.
The Need for More than Justice.Annette C. Baier - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (sup1):41-56.
The Need for More than Justice.Annette C. Baier - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 13:41-56.
The Need for More Than Justice.Annette C. Baier - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 13:41-56.

View all 8 references / Add more references