Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):404-409 (2000)

Liezl Van Zyl
University of Waikato
In this paper we examine the questions “What does it mean to be a surrogate mother?” and “What would be an appropriate perspective for a surrogate mother to have on her pregnancy?” In response to the objection that such contracts are alienating or dehumanising since they require women to suppress their evolving perspective on their pregnancies, liberal supporters of surrogate motherhood argue that the freedom to contract includes the freedom to enter a contract to bear a child for an infertile couple. After entering the contract the surrogate may not be free to interpret her pregnancy as that of a non-surrogate mother, but there is more than one appropriate way of interpreting one's pregnancy. To restrict or ban surrogacy contracts would be to prohibit women from making other particular interpretations of their pregnancies they may wish to make, requiring them to live up to a culturally constituted image of ideal motherhood. We examine three interpretations of a “surrogate pregnancy” that are implicit in the views and arguments put forward by ethicists, surrogacy agencies, and surrogate mothers themselves. We hope to show that our concern in this regard goes beyond the view that surrogacy contracts deny or suppress the natural, instinctive or conventional interpretation of pregnancy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.26.5.404
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Surrogate Motherhood: A Trust-Based Approach.Katharina Beier - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (6):633-652.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Exploitation and Commercial Surrogate Motherhood.Hugh V. McLachlan & J. K. Swales - 2001 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (1):8--14.
Surrogate Motherhood.M. Mulholland - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):221-221.
Surrogate Motherhood.Miroslav Prokopijevic - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):169-181.
Surrogate Motherhood.Christine Overall - 1987 - In Marsha Hanen & Kai Nielsen (eds.), Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume. University of Calgary Press. pp. 285.
Marxism, Feminism, and Surrogate Motherhood.Raymond A. Belliotti - 1988 - Social Theory and Practice 14 (3):389-417.
Surrogate Motherhood as Prenatal Adoption.Bonnie Steinbock - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):44-50.
Legislative Approaches to Surrogate Motherhood.R. Alta Charo - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):96-112.
Surrogate Motherhood and the Best Interests of Children.Angela R. Holder - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):51-56.
Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists.Lori B. Andrews - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):72-80.
Surrogate Motherhood: A New Option for Parenting?Barry R. Furrow - 1984 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (3):106-106.
Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis.Ruth Macklin - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):57-64.
The Contract in Surrogate Motherhood: A Review of the Issues. [REVIEW]Steven R. Gersz - 1984 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (3):107-114.
Surrogate Motherhood: Babies for Fun and Profit.Angela R. Holder - 1984 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (3):115-117.


Added to PP index

Total views
86 ( #133,757 of 2,498,758 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,758 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes