HEC Forum 26 (1):27-42 (2014)

Bart Engelen
Tilburg University
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections. It is a leading cause of cervical cancer in women but the virus is increasingly being linked to several other cancers in men and women alike. Since the introduction of safe and effective but also expensive vaccines, many developed countries have implemented selective vaccination programs for girls. Some however argue that these programs should be expanded to include boys, since (1) HPV constitutes non-negligible health risks for boys as well and (2) protected boys will indirectly also protect girls. In this paper we approach this discussion from an ethical perspective. First, on which moral grounds can one justify not reimbursing vaccination for the male sex? We develop an ethical framework to evaluate selective vaccination programs and conclude that, in the case of HPV, efficiency needs to be balanced against non-stigmatization, non-discrimination and justice. Second, if vaccination programs were to be expanded to boys as well, do the latter then also have a moral duty to become immunized? Two arguments in favor of such a moral duty are well known in vaccination ethics: the duty not to harm others and to contribute to the public good of public health. However, we argue that these are not particularly convincing in the context of HPV. In contrast, we believe a third, more powerful but also more controversial argument is possible. In our view, the sexual mode of transmission of HPV constitutes an additional reason to believe that boys in fact may have a moral obligation to accept vaccination
Keywords Infectious disease  Public health  Immunization  Efficiency  Sexually transmitted infection  HPV
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-013-9219-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Virtue Ethics.Michael Slote - 2010 - In John Skorupski (ed.), Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie. Routledge. pp. 325--347.
Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Protection Against HPV Ethically Required in the Garden of Immunity?Cambray Smith - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (1):119-136.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Public Health, Public Trust and Lobbying.Matthew K. Wynia - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):4 – 7.
Should Smallpox Vaccine Be Made Available to the General Public?Thomas May & Ross D. Silverman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):67-82.
The HPV Vaccine Controversy Where Are the Women? Where Are the Men? Where is the Money?Jennifer Caseldine-Bracht - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):99-112.
Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Human Enhancement and Sexual Dimorphism.Rob Sparrow - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (9):464-475.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #269,943 of 2,507,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,626 of 2,507,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes