Problem samodzielności stanowiska strukturalizmu czasoprzestrzennego

Semina Scientiarum 15:172-187 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to place the considerations provided by a philosophical family of positions called “spacetime structuralism” in the context of the debate between classical views: substantivalism and relationism in the philosophy of spacetime. Altough this task was somehow tackled in the past by other researchers, they never stated most generally, what exactly the problem with spacetime structuralism as a standpoint was. I view that problem as the problem of its autonomy and potential reducibility to both of the classical views. I modestly suggest a general viewpoint on spacetime structuralism: as a purely interpretative endeavour.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

General Relativity and Spacetime Relationism.Carl Hoefer - 1992 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Substantivalism, Relationism, and Structural Spacetime Realism.Mauro Dorato - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (10):1605-1628.
What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Spacetime, Ontology, and Structural Realism.Edward Slowik - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):147 – 166.
The Case for Substantivalism.Carolyn Jane Brighouse - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Southern California

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-14

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Damian Luty
Adam Mickiewicz University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations