Empiricism and Intelligent Design I: Three Empiricist Challenges

Erkenntnis 78 (3):665-679 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Due to the logical relations between theism and intelligent design (id), there are two challenges to theism that also apply to id. In the falsifiability challenge, it is charged that theism is compatible with every observation statement and thus asserts nothing. I argue that the contentious assumptions of this challenge can be avoided without loss of precision by charging theism (and thus id) directly with the lack of observational assertions. In the translatability challenge, it is charged that theism can be translated into a (non-theistic) set of observation statements without loss of cognitive content. I argue that the contentious assumptions of this challenge are avoided by the related charge that the (non-theistic) evolutionary theory makes all the observational assertions of id, while the converse does not hold. Elliott Sober has argued that id meets the falsifiability challenge, but, since it makes almost no observational assertions, is not testable. I point out two problems with Sober’s argument and show that id is both deductively and probabilistically testable. Sober’s argument, I suggest, inconsistently combines the modified falsifiability challenge with the modified translatability challenge. If his claims about id’s observational assertions are true, however, id succumbs to the modified translatability challenge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sceptical Theism and Divine Lies.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):509-523.
Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Intelligent design and probability reasoning.Elliott Sober - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2):65-80.
Firing squads and fine-tuning: Sober on the design argument.Jonathan Weisberg - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):809-821.
Studies in scientific realism.Stathis Psillos - 2001 - Foundations of Chemistry 3 (1):79-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
105 (#160,655)

6 months
24 (#108,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastian Lutz
Uppsala University

References found in this work

Language, truth and logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London,: V. Gollancz.
.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Language, Truth, and Logic.A. J. Ayer - 1936 - Philosophy 23 (85):173-176.
The existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references