DTC Advertising Harms Patients and Should Be Tightly Regulated

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):444-450 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Like all interventions in health care, direct-to-consumer advertising should be evaluated by comparing its risks to its benefits, in the context of the available or potentially available alternatives. The objective, of course, is to realize any unique benefits while minimizing the risks. On balance, the adverse effects of DTC advertising outweigh the still-unde-monstrated benefits of the advertising

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Self-Identity Image Advertising Ethical?John Douglas Bishop - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):371-398.
Towards a new paradigm in the ethics of women's advertising.John Alan Cohan - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):323 - 337.
Group risks, risks to groups, and group engagement in genetics research.Daniel M. Hausman - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):351-369.
The advertising industry's defense of its first amendment rights.John H. Crowley - 1993 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (1):5 – 16.
In defense of advertising: A social perspective. [REVIEW]Barbara J. Phillips - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (2):109-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
48 (#322,994)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Engineering Medical Decisions.Meredith Stark & Joseph J. Fins - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (4):373-381.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references