"sword Art" In Ancient Novel And Its Cultural Implication

Abstract

"Fencing" is not a martial arts sword routine, but the ancient novel common in a specific content of literary expression, in the ancient fiction of the "sword" description, "fencing" mainly by the use of the sword; sword is Aura, conscious of weapons; "sword" also includes all sorts of supernatural powers and magical spells. Device has been deified as the sword, "fencing" in the process, not only social and cultural psychological factors, there are literary inheritance and development of their own factors. At the same time, the sword device derived for the "sword" of the development process, but also Buddhism and Taoism and other religious ideas contributions. It can be said swordsman and "sword" is a Chinese social, cultural, ideological product of the Chinese nation a kind of emotional catharsis "significant" form of expression. Instead of a sword process in martial art, here Sword Art means a specific common expression in ancient novels. In such an expression, sword is depicted as inspiring conscious weapon, knowing all kinds of occult methods. The paper holds that the mystification of Sword Art is not only influenced by social and cultural psychologies, but is also the result of literary development itself. Combined with ideas from Buddhism, Taoism and other traditional Chinese cultures, Sword Art is a "significant form" catharsised the emotions of Chinese people

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

The Need of Courage.Robert Stout - 1923 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):77 – 83.
“For No Reason”.Samuel E. Balentine - 2003 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 57 (4):349-369.
Again Klytaimestra's Weapon.A. H. Sommerstein - 1989 - Classical Quarterly 39 (02):296-.
Aeschylus′ Clytemnestra: Sword or Axe?Malcolm Davies - 1987 - Classical Quarterly 37 (01):65-.
Where’s the Point?: Slavoj Žižek and the Broken Sword.Gregory Fried - 2007 - International Journal of Žižek Studies 1 (4).
The Japanese Book of the Ancient Sword.Ethel Watts Mumford - 1905 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 26:334-410.

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations