Synthese 200 (3):1-13 (
2022)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
The Russellian argument against the possibility of absolutely unrestricted quantification can be answered by the partisan of that quantification in an apparently easy way, namely, arguing that the objects used in the argument do not exist because they are defined in a viciously circular fashion. We show that taking this contention along as a premise and relying on an extremely intuitive Principle of Determinacy, it is possible to devise a reductio of the possibility of absolutely unrestricted quantification. Therefore, there are intuitive reasons to believe that the counter-argument fails to support the possibility of absolutely unrestricted quantification.