Practical arguments for prudential justifications of actions

Abstract

Practical arguments for actions are arguments which, besides their epistemic function, shall motivate an addressee to execute the justified action. First, a strategy is developed how this motivational and other requirements can be met. Part of this strategy is to identify a thesis for which holds that believing it motivates in the required manner. Second, relying on empirical decision theory, such a thesis is identified. Finally, precise validity criteria for the respective arguments are developed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Practical Arguments for Theoretical Theses.Christoph Lumer - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):329-340.
A logic of practical reasoning.Georg Spielthenner - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (2):139-153.
Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):93-131.
Constitutive arguments.Ariela Tubert - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):656-666.
Do actions occur inside the body?Helen Steward - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):107-125.
Rationality without reasons.Judith Baker - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):763-782.
Varieties of Pragmatic Encroachment.Hamid Vahid - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (1):25-41.
Reductionism in Fallacy Theory.Christoph Lumer - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):405-423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
27 (#574,515)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena

References found in this work

Argument schemes—an epistemological approach.Christoph Lumer - 2011 - Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-22, 2011.

View all 7 references / Add more references