- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Introduction: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation--A Map
Informal Logic 25 (3):189-212 (2005)
Abstract
An overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation, explaining what it is, justifying it as better than a rhetorical or a consensual ist approach.systematizing the main directions and theories according to their criteria for good argumentation and presenting their contributions to major topics of argumentation theory. Also. an introduction to the articles of the two special issues of Informal Logic about the epistemological approach to argumentationAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- amr.uwindsor.ca
(no proxy) - amr.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [3] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [4] (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca [3] (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- informallogic.ca (no proxy)
- informallogic.ca [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting.Christoph Lumer - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):51-82.
Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion.A. F. Snoeck Henkemans - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):405-419.
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
Useful argumentation: a critique of the epistemological approach.Brian Huss - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (3):261-275.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory: Springer, Argumentation Library, Dordrecht, 2011, volume 20, 209 pp.C. Andone - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):291-296.
Special Section on Argumentation and Paradoxes. Introduction.Manfred Kienpointner - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):43-45.
The empirical study of argumentation editor's introduction.Robert Trapp - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (2):125-128.
Introduction: Ramus, Perelman and Argumentation, a way through the wood. [REVIEW]Peter Sharratt - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (4):335-345.
Instantiae: An introduction to a twelfth century technique of argumentation. [REVIEW]Yukio Iwakuma - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (4):437-453.
Introduction to Special Issue of Argumentation Originating in a Conference at The University of Texas at Austin.David Braybrooke - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):361-363.
A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation.E. T. Feteris - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):355-376.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-30
Downloads
43 (#344,369)
6 months
5 (#441,012)
2013-10-30
Downloads
43 (#344,369)
6 months
5 (#441,012)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation.Frank Zenker, Jan Albert van Laar, B. Cepollaro, A. Gâţă, M. Hinton, C. G. King, B. Larson, M. Lewiński, C. Lumer, S. Oswald, M. Pichlak, B. D. Scott, M. Urbański & J. H. M. Wagemans - 2024 - Argumentation 38 (1):7-40.
The Epistemic Norm of Inference and Non-Epistemic Reasons for Belief.Patrick Bondy - 2019 - Synthese (2):1-21.
The epistemic norm of inference and non-epistemic reasons for belief.Patrick Bondy - 2021 - Synthese 198 (2):1761-1781.
Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):365-397.
References found in this work
Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.Ralph H. Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem.James B. Freeman - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-67c5d994d4-vbbq6 uwo