Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity. Proceedings of Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020) (2020)

Authors
Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena
Abstract
The paper critically discusses an empirical study by Mizrahi & Dickinson 2020, which analyzes in a huge data base (JSTORE) the incidence of three types of philosophical arguments. Their results are: 1. Deductive arguments were the most commeon type of argument in philosophy until the end of the 20th century. 2. Around 2008 a shift in methodology occurred, such that the indcutive arguments outweigh other types of argument. The paper, first, criticizes the empirical study as grossly false and considers the - very limited - possibilities of recognition of argument types by present computer programs.
Keywords philosophical arguments  empirical argument analysis  machine recognition of argument types  empirical arguments  conceptual arguments  empirical philosophy  classification of philosophical arguments
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Practical Study of Argument.Trudy Govier - 1985 - Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
Equality and Priority.Derek Parfit - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):202–221.
A Theory of Philosophical Arguments.Christoph Lumer - 2020 - Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity. Proceedings of Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020).

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Miracles: A Philosophical Analysis.Robert Sloan Lee - 2004 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Argument Schemes—an Epistemological Approach.Christoph Lumer - 2011 - Argumentation. Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-22, 2011.
Externalism, Architecturalism, and Epistemic Warrant.Martin Davies - 1998 - In Crispin Wright, Barry C. Smith & Cynthia Macdonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds. Oxford University Press. pp. 321-363.
In Search of Greene's Argument.Norbert Paulo - 2019 - Utilitas 31 (1):38-58.
Why Simpler Arguments Are Better.Moti Mizrahi - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):247-261.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-01-12

Total views
66 ( #171,992 of 2,499,433 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #34,790 of 2,499,433 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes