A formalisation of the "step forward - step backward" reasoning

Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 18:109 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our everyday thinking consists of two steps: "forward" extending our beliefs, "backward" reducing them. The "forward" step is formalized by deductive logic, but existing logics formalising "rejected sentences" reasoning are unvalid for the "backward" reasoning. We need two logics: one for the set of accepted sentences, another for the set of rejected sentences. They work on the same class of sets, so the second component of the pair must be a reasoning decreasing sets of accepted sets

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hitchcock and Deductive Reasoning.Dan Flory - 1996 - Film and Philosophy 3:38-52.
Hybrid Formulas and Elementarily Generated Modal Logics.Ian Hodkinson - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (4):443-478.
A study of backward and remote forward association.M. H. Trowbridge - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (4):319.
Associative factors in syllogistic reasoning.Lawrence T. Frase - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
30 (#481,948)

6 months
1 (#1,241,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dual counterparts of consequence operations.Ryszard Wójcicki - 1973 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 2 (1):54-57.

Add more references