Putnam on reductionism

Cognition 3 (3):289-293 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Putnam argues that reductionism, “the doctrine that the laws of such ‘higher level’ sciences as psychology and sociology are reducible to the laws of lower-level sciences - biology, chemistry, ultimately to the laws of elementary particle physics”, is wrong. In this note, I take issue with some of Putnam’s arguments.

Similar books and articles

The multiple realizability argument against reductionism.Elliott Sober - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):542-564.
Reductionism revisited.A. C. Scott - 2004 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (2):51-68.
Reductionism revisited.A. C. Scott - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies (2):51-68.
Physicalism and new wave reductionism.Ansgar Beckermann - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 61 (1):257-261.
Eliminative materialism reconsidered.Charles F. Donovan - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (June):289-303.
Is the brain a memory box?Anne Jaap Jacobson - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):271-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#164,656)

6 months
86 (#48,933)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Garfinkel on Forms of Explanation.Andrew Lugg - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):633-646.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reduction in Genetics—Biology or Philosophy?David L. Hull - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):491-499.

Add more references