Philosophy of private law

New York: Oxford University Press (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what, if any sense are our torts and our breaches of contract 'wrongs'? These two branches of private law have for centuries provided philosophers and jurists with grounds for puzzlement and this book provides both an outline of, and intervention in, contemporary jurisprudential debates about the nature and foundation of liability in private law

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Introduction

This introductory chapter situates the question about the nature of private law and the philosophical responses to it by doing two things. First, and somewhat predictably, by attempting to define key terms. It clarifies the meaning of ‘philosophy’ and then elucidates the meaning of ‘privat... see more

Conclusion

This chapter highlights some of the themes and loose ends that have emerged in both Parts I and II of this book and tries, where possible, either to trim or tie up the latter. The main burden of the analysis of the components of legal liability-responsibility in Part I was to show which co... see more

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#288,506)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Revisiting the rationality of reincarnation talk.Ankur Barua - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (3):218-231.
Philosophy of Contract Law.Daniel Markovits & Emad Atiq - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references