Callimachus and Conopion

Classical Quarterly 6 (3-4):225- (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his monumental edition of Callimachus, R. Pfeiffer has questioned the authenticity of three epigrams. More than fifty years ago U. v. Wilamowitz- Moellendorff had rejected Ep. 33 and Ep. 36 4; but Pfeiffer seems to be the first critic to exclude Ep. 63 from the collection of Callimachus' epigrams. Although he sets forth his objections in a long footnote, none of the reviewers has so far discussed this point



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,916

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Callimachus, Aetia Fr. 1.9–12.A. S. Hollis - 1978 - Classical Quarterly 28 (02):402-.
Emendations to Callimachus.G. Giangrande - 1962 - Classical Quarterly 12 (02):212-.
Two Hymns of Callimachus.M. L. West - 1986 - The Classical Review 36 (01):27-.
The Roman Callimachus.A. A. R. Henderson - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (01):27-.
Two Notes on Callimachus.A. S. Hollis - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (01):5-.
Callimachus, Hymn vi. 88.K. J. McKay - 1960 - The Classical Review 10 (02):102-103.
Callimachus, Iambus i. 9–11.B. R. Rees - 1961 - The Classical Review 11 (01):1-3.


Added to PP

12 (#813,496)

6 months
1 (#485,121)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references