Callimachus and Conopion

Classical Quarterly 6 (3-4):225- (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his monumental edition of Callimachus, R. Pfeiffer has questioned the authenticity of three epigrams. More than fifty years ago U. v. Wilamowitz- Moellendorff had rejected Ep. 33 and Ep. 36 4; but Pfeiffer seems to be the first critic to exclude Ep. 63 from the collection of Callimachus' epigrams. Although he sets forth his objections in a long footnote, none of the reviewers has so far discussed this point

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,244

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Note on Callimachus, Hynm 5.83.G. R. Mclennan - 1971 - Classical Quarterly 21 (2):425-425.
Emendations to Callimachus.G. Giangrande - 1918 - Classical Quarterly 12 (2):212-222.
Callimachus, fr. 567 Pfeiffer.E. A. Barber - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (02):101-102.
The Epigrams of Callimachus. [REVIEW]Edward S. Forster - 1934 - The Classical Review 48 (5):182-183.
The Hymns and Epigrams of Callimachus. [REVIEW]E. A. Barber - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (34):227-230.
Callimachus, Hymns, Epigrams, Select Fragments. [REVIEW]N. Hopkinson - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (2):400-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
23 (#785,013)

6 months
7 (#960,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references