Philosophy and Science as Modes of Knowing [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):764-765 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These essays concern what one of the writers calls "the philosophical problems raised by the existence of modern science," distinguishing and relating various ways of knowing, especially the scientific and philosophic. For R. J. Henle in the first and eighth essays, science and philosophy are set off from the humanities as alike in seeking pure intelligibility, but different in that science knows indirectly through a constructional concept while philosophy knows directly the ontological concept. J. Maritain discusses the shortcomings of the Vienna school of philosophy of science and the kinds of knowing proper to theology, philosophy, and science. J. Fitzgerald considers Maritain's inclusion of modern science in the Aristotelian-Thomist concept of scientific knowledge. R. Blackwell sketches four approaches to a theory of discovery in science: logical, psychological, historical, and epistemological. G. P. Klubertanz, discussing modern science in the light of Thomist doctrine, finds it like the philosophy of nature in having as its object the sensible material thing but differing in definitions, principles, and modes of proof. J. Ladrière argues the importance of intentionality in one essay, and later that both science and philosophy are authentic knowing, but that science is a description of regional ontologies while philosophy is the foundation of those ontologies. E. McMullin discusses the change from Aristotelianism to modern scientific "qualified" realism. E. Caldin finds that theological and scientific knowledge have the same structure but answer different questions. The last five essays deal with more specialized topics. F. J. Crosson: Can a machine be conscious? R. J. Henle: How does anthropology contribute to an understanding of man? A. Fisher: Freud and Husserl, and the essential intentionality of psychical life. Two surveys of modern analytic philosophy conclude the volume, E. J. McKinnon: Reflections on a methodology for integrating philosophy and science; and G. P. Klubertanz: A proposal for integrating the schools of philosophy of science.--L. G.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy and science as modes of knowing.Alden L. Fisher & George B. Murray (eds.) - 1969 - New York,: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Knowing‐Wh and Embedded Questions.Ted Parent - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):81-95.
Beyond Subjectivism.Blythe McVicker Clinchy - 2007 - Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):15-31.
Modes of Knowing and Technological Action.Stanley R. Carpenter - 1974 - Philosophy Today 18 (2):162-168.
Are There ‘Other’ Ways of Knowing?Massimo Pigliucci - 2014 - Philosophy Now (102):52-52.
Analytischer versus konstruktiver wissenschaftsbegriff.Harald Wohlrapp - 1975 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 6 (2):252-275.
Is knowing-how simply a case of knowing-that?Tobias Rosefeldt - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (4):370–379.
Modes of Knowing.Eleonore Stump - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):553-565.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
33 (#473,861)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references