Pure Time Preference: Reply to Johansson and Rosenqvist

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):442-445 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Johansson and Rosenqvist reject our argument for the rational permissibility of pure time preferences (PTP). Johansson and Rosenqvist's main objection is that where two options, X and Y, have equal intrinsic value, there will be a reason to be indifferent between X and Y, and therefore a reason to not hold a PTP for X or Y. In this reply, we argue that if two options have equal intrinsic value, it does not follow that you have a reason to be indifferent. Rather, the two equally large intrinsic values cancel each other out, like two equal weights on kitchen scales.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pure Time Preference: Reply to Johansson and Rosenqvist.Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1):442-445.
‘Pure Time Preference’: Reply to Lowry and Peterson.Jens Johansson & Simon Rosenqvist - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):435-441.
Pure time preference.Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
Pure Time Preference.Martin Peterson Rosemary Lowry - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
Pure time preference in intertemporal welfare economics.J. Paul Kelleher - 2017 - Economics and Philosophy 33 (3):441-473.
Death’s Badness and Time-Relativity: A Reply to Purves.Taylor W. Cyr - 2016 - The Journal of Ethics 20 (4):435-444.
Capital, Interest, and Professor Kirzner.Roger W. Garrison - 2002 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 12 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-07

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Rosemary Lowry
University of Adelaide (PhD)
Martin Peterson
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pure time preference.Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
‘Pure Time Preference’: Reply to Lowry and Peterson.Jens Johansson & Simon Rosenqvist - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):435-441.
Pure Time Preference.Martin Peterson Rosemary Lowry - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.

Add more references