Lenny Moss, What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 256 pp., $21.00 [Book Review]

Philosophy of Science 73 (2):247-250 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Book review of Lenny Moss, What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 256 pp. Many philosophers of science will have encountered the core distinction between two different gene concepts found in What Genes Can’t Do. Moss argues that contemporary uses of the term ‘gene’ that denote an information bearing entity result from the conflation of two concepts (‘Gene-P’ and ‘Gene-D’).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lenny Moss: What Genes Can’t Do. [REVIEW]Alan C. Love - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2):247-250.
Looking beyond gene concepts. [REVIEW]Alan C. Love - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2):247–250.
What Genes Can’t Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):383-384.
What Genes Can't Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - MIT Press.
Review of Lenny Moss, What Genes Can't Do[REVIEW]Jonathan Michael Kaplan - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
Moss, Lenny. What genes can't do.Pascal Borry - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):75-77.
The gene-for confusion.Lenny Moss - 2001 - The Philosophers' Magazine 13:46-47.
The Meanings of the Gene and the Future of the Phenotype.Lenny Moss - 2008 - Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (1):1-20.
Prague – a 21st-century salon and beyond?Lenny Moss - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (3):284-285.
Commentary on Falk and Downes.Lenny Moss - 2004 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):123 - 129.
Ethical expertise and moral maturity: Conflict or complement?Lenny Moss - 1990 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (3):227-235.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-31

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Love
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Concepts are not a natural kind.Edouard Machery - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (3):444-467.

Add more references