Individual Differences in the Moralization of Everyday Life

Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):248-257 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We report on the development and initial validation of the Moralization of Everyday Life Scale, designed to measure variations in people's assignment of moral weight to commonplace behaviors. In Study 1, participants reported their judgments for a large number of potential moral infractions in everyday life; principal components analysis revealed 6 main dimensions of these judgments. In Study 2, scores on the 30-item MELS showed high reliability and distinctness from the Big 5 personality traits. In Study 3, scores on the MELS were strongly correlated with scores on an early scale of moral judgments, suggesting convergent validity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The everyday life reader.Ben Highmore (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
Everyday Aesthetics.Yuriko Saito - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Everyday aesthetics.Yuriko Saito - 2001 - Philosophy and Literature 25 (1):87-95.
The Virtues of Ignorance.Adam Feltz & Edward T. Cokely - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (3):335-350.
Good citizens and moral heroes.Adam Morton - 2009 - In Pedro Alexis Tabensky (ed.), The Positive Function of Evil. Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-30

Downloads
34 (#445,975)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?