Michael J. Loux (ed.)
Cornell University Press (1979)
AbstractPreface In these days, an anthology on the topic of possible worlds hardly needs justification. No issue has given rise to as much literature in the past ...
Similar books and articles
The Ontological Turn Misunderstood: How to Misunderstand David Armstrong’s Theory of Possibility.Daniel von Wachter - 2004 - Metaphysica 5 (2):105-114.
Necessity and Possibility: The Metaphysics of Modality.Michael Tooley (ed.) - 1999 - Garland.
Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology.Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Logical Pluralism is Compatible with Monism About Metaphysical Modality.Nicola Ciprotti & Luca Moretti - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):275-284.
Introduction to Alvin Plantinga, Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality.Matthew Davidson - 2003 - In Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.
In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic.Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:431-458.
References found in this work
No references found.