Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):347-350 (1998)

Abstract
This paper offers a definition of quality for products, explains why engineers are morally responsible for quality, and outlines how engineers can fulfill this responsibility.
Keywords design  engineering  manufacturing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-998-0026-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Can Designing and Selling Low-Quality Products Be Ethical?Willem Bakker & Michael C. Loui - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):153-170.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Regulation or Responsibility? Autonomy, Moral Imagination, and Engineering.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2006 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (3):237-260.
The Social Ascription of Obligations to Engineers.J. S. Busby & M. Coeckelbergh - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):363-376.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
44 ( #259,443 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,509 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes