Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):113 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(83)90016-x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Whewell and the Scientists: Science and Philosophy of Science in 19th Century Britain.Laura Snyder - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:81-94.
History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate.Aaron D. Cobb - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
Whewell and mill on induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Reforming philosophy: a Victorian debate on science and society.Laura J. Snyder - 2006 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mill's System of Logic.David Godden - 2014 - In W. J. Mander (ed.), Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the nineteenth century. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-70.
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Volume 1: Founded Upon Their History.William Whewell - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Whewell's Critics: Have They Prevented Him from Doing Good?John Wettersten - 2005 - Rodopi.
The Whewell-mill debate in a nutshell.Malcolm Forster - manuscript
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences 2 Volume Set: Founded Upon Their History.William Whewell - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Popper’s Historical Role: Innovative Dissident. [REVIEW]John Wettersten - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (1):119 - 133.
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Volume 2: Founded Upon Their History.William Whewell - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Whewell’s tidal researches: scientific practice and philosophical methodology.Steffen Ducheyne - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):26-40.
William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the Methodology of Political Economy.Samuel Hollander - 1983 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):127.
Inference to the best explanation: Or, who won the Mill-Whewell debate?Peter Achinstein - 1992 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):349-364.
The Method and Induction: William Whewell and Current Philosophy of Science.Laura Joy Snyder - 1996 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
48 (#323,919)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Whewell's Consilience of Inductions–An Evaluation.Menachem Fisch - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):239-255.
The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado about Induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (2):159-198.
Inductivism in Practice: Experiment in John Herschel’s Philosophy of Science.Aaron D. Cobb - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (1):21-54.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references