- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review. Scientific method: an historical and philosophical introduction. Barry Gower
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):508-510 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Barry Gower, Scientific Method: An historical and philosophical introduction. [REVIEW]J. Dance - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (1):121-121.
Barry Gower, Scientific Method. An historical and philosophical introduction Marta Feher, Changing Tools. Case studies in the history of scientific methodology. [REVIEW]Eric Oberheim - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (1):127-135.
A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, 2nd ed. [REVIEW]Gary C. Hatfield - 1983 - Teaching Philosophy 6 (1):76-78.
John Losee, A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1981 - Philosophy in Review 1 (2/3):98-100.
John Losee, Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. [REVIEW]Joel Smith - 1989 - Philosophy in Review 9:58-60.
A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. By John Losee. [REVIEW]Richard J. Blackwell - 1983 - Modern Schoolman 60 (2):134-135.
How to defend science against scepticism: A reply to Barry Gower.Alan Chalmers - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):249-253.
A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Fourth edition.John Losee - 2001 - Philosophy 8 (1).
Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. John Losee. [REVIEW]David Oldroyd - 1988 - Isis 79 (1):138-139.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
102 (#229,107)
6 months
20 (#185,376)
2009-01-28
Downloads
102 (#229,107)
6 months
20 (#185,376)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social Engagement.Angela Potochnik & Francis Cartieri - 2013 - Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 5):901-916.
Philosophical reasoning about science: a quantitative, digital study.Moti Mizrahi & Michael Adam Dickinson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2).
The Principle of Inversion: Why the Quantitative-Empirical Paradigm Cannot Serve as a Unifying Basis for Psychology as an Academic Discipline.Roland Mayrhofer & Fabian Hutmacher - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
A rationale for mixed methods (integrative) research programmes in education.Mansoor Niaz - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (2):287-305.
Optimistic Fiction as a Tool for Ethical Reflection in STEM.Kathryn Strong Hansen - 2021 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (3):425-439.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-55mvq uwo