Pshaw!

Abstract

Since my proposed framework for meaning (in Holist" and Atomist") is neither simply a psychosemantic holism nor simply a psychosemantic atomism, but a marriage in which the two have become one, we might call it a psychosemantic holism-atomism wedlock (PSHAW). In this paper I want to.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Psychosemantic analyticity.Richard Horsey - 2001 - [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
How to be a meaning holist.Eric Lormand - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):51-73.
Multiple meanings and stability of content.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (5):255-63.
Is content holism incoherent?Kirk A. Ludwig - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 46 (1):173-195.
Wittgenstein, locality and rules.Carlo Penco - 2004 - In Annalisa Coliva & Eva Picardi (eds.), Wittgenstein Today. Il Poligrafo. pp. 249--74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#443,903)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Lormand
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references