Conceiving as Existent: A Final Rejoinder to Davis [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):123 - 125 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#459,346)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anselm, meinong, and the ontological argument.Peter J. Loptson - 1980 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):185 - 194.
Loptson on Anselm and Rowe.Stephen T. Davis - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):219 - 224.
Loptson on Anselm and Davis.Stephen T. Davis - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (3):245 - 249.
Anselm, Meinong, and the Ontological Argument.Peter J. Lopston - 1980 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):185.
Anselm and Rowe: A Reply to Davis. [REVIEW]Peter Loptson - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1/2):67 - 71.

Add more references