Anselm, meinong, and the ontological argument

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):185 - 194 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00134518

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Arthur J. banning press minneapolis.Jasper Hopkins - unknown
The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of religion: classic and contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Some Ontological Arguments.Hugh S. Chandler - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32.
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate. Edited by Anselm.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
The ontological argument.Peter Millican - unknown
The one fatal flaw in Anselm's argument.Peter Millican - 2004 - Mind 113 (451):437-476.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#267,103)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Conceiving as Existent: A Final Rejoinder to Davis. [REVIEW]Peter Loptson - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):123 - 125.
Anselm and Rowe: A Reply to Davis. [REVIEW]Peter Loptson - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1/2):67 - 71.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references