Quantitative tests of the Perceived Relative Argument Model: Reply to Guo and Regenwetter (2014)

Psychological Review 121 (4):706-710 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/a0037841

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Quantitative tests of the Perceived Relative Argument Model: Comment on Loomes (2010).Ying Guo & Michel Regenwetter - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (4):696-705.
Testing with the Toulmin Model.Jan Sobocan - unknown
Because Hitler did it! Quantitative tests of Bayesian argumentation using ad hominem.Adam J. L. Harris, Anne S. Hsu & Jens K. Madsen - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):311 - 343.
Relative size in isolation as a stimulus for relative perceived distance.William Epstein & Stephen S. Baratz - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):507.
A test of the argument engagement model in Romania.Ioana Cionea, Dale Hample, Fabio Paglieri & Lilian Bermejo-Luque - unknown
Percepţia discriminării de gen la nivelul populaţiei educate tinere din România - o abordare cantitativa/ Perception of Gender Discrimination at the Level of Young Education Population from Romania. A Quantitative Approach.Tudorel Andrei, Erika Tusa & Claudiu Herteliu - 2006 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (14):51-62.
Parsimonious testing of transitive or intransitive preferences: Reply to Birnbaum (2011).Michel Regenwetter, Jason Dana, Clintin P. Davis-Stober & Ying Guo - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (4):684-688.
Some Tests of an Unsupervised Model of Language Acquisition.Shimon Edelman - unknown
Phenomenological Argumentative Structure.Gilbert Plumer - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):173-189.
The Dilemma of Normativity: How to Interpret a Rational Reconstruction? [REVIEW]Paul van den Hoven - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):411-417.
The harm of death, time-relative interests, and abortion.David Degrazia - 2007 - Philosophical Forum 38 (1):57–80.
Action and Performance: Models and Tests : Contributions to the Quantitative Psychology and Its Methodology.Jerzy Brzeziński & Tadeusz Marek (eds.) - 1990 - Rodopi.
A stochastic model of preference change and its application to 1992 presidential election panel data.Michel Regenwetter, Jean-Claude Falmagne & Bernard Grofman - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (2):362-384.
The Influence of Argumentative Role (Initiator vs. Resistor) on Perceptions of Serial Argument Resolvability and Relational Harm.Kristen Linnea Johnson & Michael E. Roloff - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (1):1-15.
Singular Terms Revisited.Robert Schwartzkopff - 2016 - Synthese 193 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intransitivity of preferences.Amos Tversky - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (1):31-48.
New paradoxes of risky decision making.Michael H. Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):463-501.
Modeling choice and valuation in decision experiments.Graham Loomes - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (3):902-924.

Add more references