Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (1):177-192 (2017)

Authors
Fiachra Long
University College, Cork
Abstract
Peter Sloterdijk presented a reading of Heidegger's Letter on Humanism at a conference held at Elmau in 1999. Reinterpreting the meaning of humanism in the light of Heidegger's Letter, Sloterdijk focused his presentation on the need to redefine education as a form of genetic ‘taming’ and proposed what seemed to be support for positive eugenics. Although Sloterdijk claimed that he only wanted to open a debate on the issue, he could not have been surprised at the level of opposition this suggestion aroused. In the weeks following, he blamed Habermas for raising this opposition and for refusing to engage with him openly. Although Luis Arenas has chronicled the aftermath of Sloterdijk's paper, it may be of interest to educators to examine how Heidegger's text is presented. What is this new humanism? If Heidegger's new humanism was based on a mystical attitude towards Being, so Sloterdijk's new humanism was to be based on the materialist principles of a biotechnological age. Unlike Heidegger who rejected technology as yet one further example of the forgetfulness of Being, Sloterdijk seems to embrace technology and the enhancement of the human body and mind as the next great step forward in educational theory. Could he possibly be right? Is education in these times a partner or an opponent of the technological enhancement of the human being? This article tries to identify Sloterdijk's disagreements with Heidegger on the question of the human.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9752.12192
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.
The Basic Works of Aristotle. [REVIEW]E. A. M. - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (20):553-555.
The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit.S. Turkle - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:520.
Transhumanism, Medical Technology and Slippery Slopes.M. J. McNamee - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):513-518.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Overcoming Transhumanism: Education or Enhancement Towards the Overhuman?Markus Lipowicz - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 53 (1):200-213.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Coming-to-the-World of the Human Animal.Marie-Eve Morin - 2011 - In Stuart Elden (ed.), Sloterdijk Now. Polity. pp. 77-95.
De utopie Van Peter Sloterdijk: 'Regels voor het mensenpark'.Hans Achterhuis - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (3):451 - 478.
Metaphysik Als Traumatologie – Zu Heidegger Und Sloterdijk.Bernhard Sylla - 2015 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 71 (2-3):495-514.
¿Ultrahumanismos?Jorge Dávila - 2001 - Signos Filosóficos 6:113-132.
Neither Sun nor Death.Steve Corcoran (ed.) - 2011 - Semiotext(E).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-28

Total views
15 ( #694,125 of 2,497,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,370 of 2,497,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes