Nicholas of Cusa and Man’s Knowledge of God

Philosophy Research Archives 13:289-313 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that Nicholas of Cusa agrees with Thomas Aquinas on the metaphysics of analogy in God, but differs on epistemology, taking a Platonic position against Aquinas’ Aristotelianism. As a result Cusa has to rethink Thomas’ solution to the problem of discourse about God. In De docta ignorantia he uses the mathematics of the infinite as a clue to the relations between a thing and its Measure and this allows him, he thinks, to adapt Aquinas’ approach to the problem of his own epistemology. The resulting approach, I maintain, is coherent and reasonable if the metaphysical views behind it are

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464): First Modern Philosopher?Jasper Hopkins - 2002 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):13–29.
Scholastic Meditations.Nicholas Rescher - 2005 - Catholic University of America Press.
Becoming God: The Doctrine of Theosis in Nicholas of Cusa (Review).Thomas M. Izbicki - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):660-661.
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
43 (#269,036)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Longeway
University of Wisconsin, Parkside

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references