Philosophy Research Archives 13:289-313 (1987)
AbstractI argue that Nicholas of Cusa agrees with Thomas Aquinas on the metaphysics of analogy in God, but differs on epistemology, taking a Platonic position against Aquinas’ Aristotelianism. As a result Cusa has to rethink Thomas’ solution to the problem of discourse about God. In De docta ignorantia he uses the mathematics of the infinite as a clue to the relations between a thing and its Measure and this allows him, he thinks, to adapt Aquinas’ approach to the problem of his own epistemology. The resulting approach, I maintain, is coherent and reasonable if the metaphysical views behind it are
Similar books and articles
Nicholas of Cusa on God as Not-Other: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Li Non Aliud.Anzelm Z. Canterbury - 1987 - A.J. Banning Press.
Prolegomena to Nicholas of Cusa's Conception of the Relationship of Faith to Reason.Jasper Hopkins - unknown
Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464): First Modern Philosopher?Jasper Hopkins - 2002 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):13–29.
Becoming God: The Doctrine of Theosis in Nicholas of Cusa (Review).Thomas M. Izbicki - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):660-661.
An Environment Friendly God: Response to Nancy Hudson’s “Divine Immanence”. [REVIEW]Robert S. Gall - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):357-360.
Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident.Mark D. Gossiaux - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Norman Kretzmann on Aquinass Attribution of Will and of Freedom to Create to God.John F. Wippel - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How a Modest Fideism May Constrain Theistic Commitments: Exploring an Alternative to Classical Theism.John Bishop - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):387-402.
References found in this work
No references found.