Liberalism beyond borders

Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):206-233 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While citizens of developed countries enjoy lives of unmatched affluence, over a billion people struggle to subsist on incomes of less than $1/day. Can't we conclude that their poverty constitutes a glaring injustice? The answer almost certainly is yes—but not because some countries are rich, nor because of inadequate levels of redistribution. Liberal political theory traditionally maintains that persons are rights-holders, and the primary duty owed them is noninterference. Corrupt and tyrannical governments flagrantly violate the liberty rights of their captive populations. External governments conspicuously fail to respect noninterference, however, when they erect barriers to trade between foreign nationals and their own citizens, subsidize domestic industries, prevent innocent movement across borders by would-be workers, and when they tender assistance to abusive states (such as foreign aid that lines the pockets of kleptocrats and enhances their power). The theory advanced here is similar to that of Rawls in rejecting an international difference principle, but unlike Rawls it advances an account of international justice as continuous with domestic principles of justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
182 (#99,885)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Loren Lomasky
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

Is it wrong to eat animals?Loren Lomasky - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):177-200.
Humanitarian intervention: Loose ends.Fernando R. Tesón - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):192-212.
Euvoluntary or not, exchange is just*: Michael C. munger.Michael C. Munger - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2):192-211.
Enabling Monsters: A Reply to Professor Miller.Fernando R. Tesón - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (2):165-182.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references