The Relevance of Heidegger’s Conception of Philosophy to the Film-as-Philosophy Debate

Film and Philosophy 19:34-53 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Provides an account of philosophy adopted from Being and Time and later works of Heidegger in order to respond to key questions in the film-as-philosophy debate. I follow the school of Stanley Cavell, Robert Sinnerbrink, and Stephen Mulhall in the view that philosophy occurs in film in phenomenological ways that transcend mere argumentative discourse and logical analysis. Some of the views I counter include those of Bruce Russell and Paisley Livingston.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cavell on film.Stanley Cavell - 2005 - Albany: State University of New York Press. Edited by William Rothman.
Re-enfranchising Film: Towards a Romantic Film-Philosophy.”.Robert Sinnerbrink - 2011 - In Havi Carel & Greg Tuck (eds.), New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 25--47.
Reading Cavell.Alice Crary & Sanford Shieh (eds.) - 2006 - New York: Routledge.
Stephen Mulhall (2008) On Film , 2nd Edition.Joshua Shaw - 2009 - Film-Philosophy 13 (1):187-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-05

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shawn Loht
Delgado Community College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references