Kant, Hume, Darwin, and design: Why intelligent design wasn't science before Darwin and still isn't

Philosophical Forum 38 (2):95–123 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9191.2007.00258.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Intelligent Design and the End of Science.Jeffrey Koperski - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
The logical underpinnings of intelligent design.William Dembski - manuscript
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Intelligent design is not optimal design.William Dembski - manuscript
The Infinite Universe and Dembski’s Design Inference.Bradley Monton - unknown
Design and its discontents.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):271 - 289.
No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence.William A. Dembski - 2002 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Darwin, Design and Dawkins' Dilemma.David H. Glass - 2012 - Sophia 51 (1):31-57.
=====Foreword to How Blind is the Watchmaker?=====.William Dembski - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
83 (#195,778)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Role of Metaphysical Naturalism in Science.Martin Mahner - 2012 - Science & Education 21 (10):1437–1459.
Kant-Bibliographie 2007.Margit Ruffing - 2009 - Kant Studien 100 (4):526-564.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references